Is SPX safe?
SPX6900 (Wormhole) (SPX) · Solana · on-chain safety read, grade A (100/100)
Data snapshot: 2026-08-10 · source: Jupiter token API + on-chain flags · refreshed weekly · not financial advice
TrustDex score: higher = safer (0–100)
- freeze authority renounced
- liquidity depth is healthy
- the creator wallet holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%)
Re-scan SPX live before you trade
On-chain state changes — verify the current read, then swap non-custodially if it clears.
What the data says about SPX
One detail on SPX didn't fully resolve in the 2026-08-10 snapshot: its authority state. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, SPX shows a $2.02M pool and 69,735 wallets holding as of 2026-08-10. Encouragingly, that $2.02M pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $26.78M — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 69,735 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SPX holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-08-10 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
This read can get better or softer over time, so here's what drives it: SPX earns a higher grade as the pool deepens past $2.02M and the holder base widens; and it eases if liquidity drifts away from $2.02M or ownership gets tighter. On-chain data shifts week to week, so it's always worth a quick live check on SPX before trading.
Balance concentration: the 10 largest token accounts hold 20.33% of SPX's supply as of 2026-08-09 — a comparatively wide distribution for its size. Note these are token accounts: liquidity pools, exchange wallets and lockers count among them, so read this together with liquidity, not instead of it.
Safety history of SPX
Weekly snapshots — how SPX’s market structure and grade have moved over time.
| Date | Liquidity | Holders | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-10 | $2.02M | 69,735 | A |
| 2026-08-09 | $2.04M | 69,719 | A |
Contract
J3NKxxXZcnNiMjKw9hYb2K4LUxgwB6t1FtPtQVsv3KFr
Verify SPX by this address, never by name or ticker.
FAQ
Is SPX a safe token?
As of the 2026-08-10 snapshot, SPX scores 100/100 (grade A) on TrustDex's on-chain read — based on its unconfirmed mint authority, renounced freeze authority, liquidity of $2.02M and 69,735 holders, with the creator wallet holding <0.01% of supply. That grades contract and market structure, not price direction — a clean read is not a guarantee, so re-scan before trading, since on-chain state can change.
Can you sell SPX, or is it a honeypot?
On Solana, the lever that can block a sale is the freeze authority, and SPX's is renounced as of 2026-08-10 — no one can freeze your balance to trap you in. With $2.02M of liquidity there's a pool to sell into, though how cleanly depends on your size against that depth.
Who holds most of SPX?
The wallet that created SPX holds <0.01% of the supply as of 2026-08-10 — a small stake, under the 5% the scanners flag. That sits alongside a holder base of 69,735; a broad base lowers the odds that any one seller can steer the price, but the creator's share is the number to watch first.
Can SPX's supply be inflated?
The mint authority state couldn't be confirmed from the 2026-08-10 snapshot — verify it with a live scan before relying on the supply being fixed.
What is the SPX contract address?
The SPX mint address on Solana is J3NKxxXZcnNiMjKw9hYb2K4LUxgwB6t1FtPtQVsv3KFr. Always verify a token by its contract address, not its name or ticker — scam clones copy tickers, but the address is unique.
Where can you buy SPX safely?
Run the live on-chain scan at the top of this page first; if SPX clears, you can swap it here directly. Whatever venue you use, match the contract address (J3NKxxXZcnNiMjKw9hYb2K4LUxgwB6t1FtPtQVsv3KFr) exactly before trading — copying the ticker is how clone scams catch buyers, and the address is the one field they can't fake.