Is $WIF safe?
dogwifhat ($WIF) · Solana · on-chain safety read, grade A (100/100)
Data snapshot: 2026-08-10 · source: Jupiter token API + on-chain flags · refreshed weekly · not financial advice
TrustDex score: higher = safer (0–100)
- mint authority renounced
- freeze authority renounced
- liquidity depth is healthy
- the creator wallet holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%)
Re-scan $WIF live before you trade
On-chain state changes — verify the current read, then swap non-custodially if it clears.
What the data says about $WIF
$WIF starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The mint authority has been renounced, so the supply is fixed and no one can dilute it, and freeze is disabled as well, so selling is always your call. That leaves $WIF at a healthy 100/100 as of 2026-08-10, with only normal market risk left to price in.
Looking at the market data, $WIF shows deep liquidity of $4.28M and 255,682 wallets holding as of 2026-08-10. Set the $4.28M of depth beside roughly $142.97M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. With 255,682 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-08-10, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
Two forces will shape $WIF's grade going forward. It climbs as liquidity keeps building past $4.28M and the holder base stays healthy; and it would ease back if liquidity thinned out or holdings became more concentrated. It's a 2026-08-10 snapshot rather than a live feed, so give $WIF a fresh scan before you commit.
Balance concentration: the 10 largest token accounts hold 44.22% of $WIF's supply as of 2026-08-09 — meaningful concentration; watch whether the large accounts are pools and lockers or free wallets. Note these are token accounts: liquidity pools, exchange wallets and lockers count among them, so read this together with liquidity, not instead of it.
Safety history of $WIF
Weekly snapshots — how $WIF’s market structure and grade have moved over time.
| Date | Liquidity | Holders | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-10 | $4.28M | 255,682 | A |
| 2026-08-09 | $4.29M | 255,702 | A |
Contract
EKpQGSJtjMFqKZ9KQanSqYXRcF8fBopzLHYxdM65zcjm
Verify $WIF by this address, never by name or ticker.
FAQ
Is $WIF a safe token?
As of the 2026-08-10 snapshot, $WIF scores 100/100 (grade A) on TrustDex's on-chain read — based on its renounced mint authority, renounced freeze authority, liquidity of $4.28M and 255,682 holders, with the creator wallet holding <0.01% of supply. That grades contract and market structure, not price direction — a clean read is not a guarantee, so re-scan before trading, since on-chain state can change.
Can you sell $WIF, or is it a honeypot?
On Solana, the lever that can block a sale is the freeze authority, and $WIF's is renounced as of 2026-08-10 — no one can freeze your balance to trap you in. With $4.28M of liquidity there's a pool to sell into, though how cleanly depends on your size against that depth.
Who holds most of $WIF?
The wallet that created $WIF holds <0.01% of the supply as of 2026-08-10 — a small stake, under the 5% the scanners flag. That sits alongside a holder base of 255,682; a broad base lowers the odds that any one seller can steer the price, but the creator's share is the number to watch first.
Can $WIF's supply be inflated?
No — the mint authority is renounced as of the 2026-08-10 snapshot, so no new supply can be created and the circulating figure is a ceiling.
What is the $WIF contract address?
The $WIF mint address on Solana is EKpQGSJtjMFqKZ9KQanSqYXRcF8fBopzLHYxdM65zcjm. Always verify a token by its contract address, not its name or ticker — scam clones copy tickers, but the address is unique.
Where can you buy $WIF safely?
Run the live on-chain scan at the top of this page first; if $WIF clears, you can swap it here directly. Whatever venue you use, match the contract address (EKpQGSJtjMFqKZ9KQanSqYXRcF8fBopzLHYxdM65zcjm) exactly before trading — copying the ticker is how clone scams catch buyers, and the address is the one field they can't fake.